Should the united states adopt the

The French established their own as well along the Mississippi River. Many settlers were dissenting Christian groups who came seeking religious freedom. Cash crops included tobacco, rice, and wheat. Extraction industries grew up in furs, fishing and lumber.

Should the united states adopt the

No new arguments in the final round 4. No semantics abuse 6. Violation of any of these rules or of any of the R1 set-up merits a loss. If you find a way to accept this without my permisson, you will suffer a automatic loss Con I thank my opponent for an interesting debate Topic. To start off I have a couple of questions for my opponent to clarify for this debate, given that he asked that the contender start arguments in round 1.

If such zones were to exist, we would have to consider the many different factors that go into one making one of these zones work. First of all, is a zone a small area the size as a military base, is it a whole county, or is it something the size of an entire state?

What type of punishments would be a result of a gay individual being caught in an anti-gay zone? Hopefully my opponent will answers these questions in the next round, as this will open up some different avenues of debate.

Most simply follow the belief either through religious influence, or their own personal preference that Gay Marriage is simply immoral.

Coordinates. The United States of America (USA), commonly known as the United States (U.S.) or America, is a federal republic composed of 50 states, a federal district, five major self-governing territories, and various possessions. At million square miles ( million km 2), the United States is the world's third- or fourth-largest country by total area and just fractionally smaller than. The United States should maintain the Cuba embargo because Cuba has not met the conditions required to lift it. Proclamation signed by President Kennedy on Feb. 3, , established the embargo against Cuba to reduce "the threat posed by its alignment with the communist powers.". BACKGROUND. The parties to this Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) are the United States of America, Louisiana Tech University (“the University”), and the Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System (“the Board”).

This does not however mean most of these individuals do not want to be anywhere around other Gay individuals.

We get into the issue of Anti-Gun Zones for individuals who are pro-gun control or Anti-abortion zones for individuals who happen to be pro-life. How necessary or important is it to push out legislation to create such territories? Government officials then also have to worry about the many multiple things that would go into making such zones work.

IE finances, law enforcement, maintainability, etc. In Conclusion, I will not be focusing to heavily on building a Con case in this debate.

Cuba Embargo -

Because of the 5, character limit, and 2. My opponent being the instigator of the debate, more likely has an idea of how the claim in the resolution will be supported. Good luck Mikal, I look forward to an interesting debate.

He is a great friend of mine and I think this will be a very unique and interesting debate. Jumping right into this 1 The Status Quo Whether people want to admit it or not, the affirmation in this resolution supports the status quo.

The reason I ran this as a shared BOP is due to that reason. Without the Burden being shared, I would be debating a truism which would serve no practical purpose. Private property is a fundamental concept in the United States of America, and one that everyone must respect.

Anything which destroys any of the elements of property, to that extent, destroys the property itself.

Should the united states adopt the

The substantial value of property lies in its use. If the right of use be denied, the value of the property is annihilated and ownership is rendered a barren right.

Legally you can deny someone entry in to your home, and the only way that right can be infringed on is with due cause.

Meaning you can discriminate and scan who enters your home, and you have under full authority of the law the right to pick who enters your home because it is your property. In that sense no gay zones already exist, especially in the context of religious households, and other people that do not support gay marriage.

As much as we hate to admit it, if someone does not want someone to enter their home for whatever reason they can come up with, outside of due process and just cause, they can deny them the right to enter.

Again in that sense, the resolution is already affirmed, and it's just about getting the United States to Acknowledge it. However that is not what this debate is about, but its quite plausible to go that route. It would simply have the same consequences as trespassing on private property. I am simply affirming that the United States should extend private property laws, to the extent that it is relative to specifically gays 2 Scaling the Argument Since we know that private property laws are already a thing, and that people can deny people entrance into their home.


There are already "no gay zones" in that sense. What I would also propose is that this line of logic is extended equally to religious institutions for obvious reasons. There are still quite a few religious sects that oppose same sect marriage. Baptists, Pentecostals, etc all prohibit it and consider same sex marriage a sin.

If we apply this concept to churches it would be a net benefit. You are stopping situations that could lead to negative impacts, and also respecting someones right to religion. Discrimination is not a crime, and someone can believe what they want to believe for whatever reason they want to believe.

If a religious person wants to worship in church in a environment they are comfortable with, they should be able to.The United States doesn't have an official language and shouldn't adopt such a thing because we are a melting pot of several cultures.


Spanish is the major second language of many people in the USA, but it shouldn't be an official language. BACKGROUND. The parties to this Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) are the United States of America, Louisiana Tech University (“the University”), and the Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System (“the Board”).

The Humane Society of the United States is the nation's largest and most effective animal protection organization. The United States should adopt some of Finland’s prenatal, and after birth ideas to create less stress with new parents and babies here in the US.

The First policy seen in Finland that should be adopted by the US is the amount of leave the women gets for having the baby. Should the US Adopt a National Health Care Plan?

GUJHS. April; Vol. 1, No. 3. The United States should adopt a single-payer system because it would reduce the cost of care and eliminate wasteful, costly bureaucracy and provide all citizens with preventive and primary care, improving the quality of care for all.

Medicine must be a. 23 laws from other countries the US should adopt. Photo: metin2sell.comine. Sven Eberlein. Feb 6, Here are 23 laws from around the world that, while maybe not perfect, could be steps in the right direction to make the United States a better place to live.

The Law of Mother Earth.

Same-sex marriage in the United States - Wikipedia